Higher education
Departments, labs, institutes and programs — WCAG-serious builds, governed publishing for many editors, and information architecture that survives committees.
Markets · Massachusetts
Massachusetts buyers read the footnotes. Universities with accessibility mandates, biotechs with review processes, hospitals with compliance officers, SaaS teams with technical standards — this is a market of exacting organisations. We do well here because our work is built to be examined: accessible, documented, standards-based WordPress.

Who we work with
Serving Boston, Cambridge, Worcester, Springfield — and everywhere in between. The work concentrates where Massachusetts's economy does:
Departments, labs, institutes and programs — WCAG-serious builds, governed publishing for many editors, and information architecture that survives committees.
Company and pipeline sites for the Cambridge cluster: scientific credibility in the design, investor-grade polish, and content workflows that respect legal review.
Patient-facing sites where accessibility, clarity and speed are clinical requirements — plus the integrations into scheduling and portal systems.
The Route 128 software economy: componentised marketing sites growth teams can run, with the analytics rigor Boston’s data-literate marketers expect.
Why us
Every serious Massachusetts organisation has a review our work must survive: an accessibility office, a compliance team, a professor emeritus with opinions. We build for the review from day one — WCAG AA as an engineering practice, documented decisions, and evidence rather than assurances. Approval is smoother when the homework is already done.
Questions
If your situation isn't covered here, send us the details and we'll reply with a straight answer.
No — Massachusetts is served remotely on Eastern Time, full working-day overlap. Our clients here are institutions and technical companies that evaluate vendors on capability, compliance and references; on that scorecard, geography has never been the deciding line.
Yes — higher-ed accessibility standards (WCAG 2.1 AA and institutional policies) are hard requirements we build to, not aspirations. Semantic structure, keyboard and screen-reader testing, accessible documents strategy, and a conformance write-up your accessibility office can actually use.
That is a governance problem we solve structurally: locked block patterns, role-based permissions, editorial workflows and a design system in code. A department with forty editors keeps a consistent site because the system makes inconsistency difficult.
Yes — security posture summaries, accessibility conformance, insurance and process documentation are normal parts of institutional procurement, and we come prepared for them. The paperwork is smoother when the underlying practices are real.